About your Search

20130201
20130228
Search Results 0 to 8 of about 9 (some duplicates have been removed)
and point 6 was allegedly senator hagel said that the u.s. state department was an adjunct of the israeli foreign minister's office, which i think would be breath taking if he said that, had such a view and i got a letter back from senator hagel, in response to my question, did you say that and do you believe that, and, the letter says he did not recall saying that and disavowed that statement. >> chris: is that enough for you? >> well if that is true, that would end the matter because he previously said in a book the jewish lobby intimidates members of congress, particularly the u.s. senate and makes us -- pushes us to make very bad decisions. if the second statement were true, he said, the secretary of state's office is under the control of the israeli foreign ministers, those two together, would edge our view of the israe israeli-u.s. relationship way out. >> chris: democrats say you are playing politics with national security. here's what president obama said. >> president barack obama: it is just unfortunate that this kind of politics intrudes at a time when i'm still presiding over
, textile production in spain, and the use of medical technology in the u.s.? at t. rowe price, we understand the connections of a complex, global economy. it's just one reason over 75% of our mutual funds beat their 10-year lipper average. t. rowe price. invest with confidence. request a prospectus or summary prospectus with investment information, risks, fees and expenses to read and consider carefully before investing. i work for 47 different companies. well, technically i work for one. that company, the united states postal service®, works for thousands of home businesses. because at usps.com®, you can pay, print and have your packages picked up for free. i can even drop off free boxes. i wear a lot of hats. well, technically i wear one. the u.s. postal service®, no business too small. no they don't. hey son. have fun tonight. ♪ ♪ back against the wall ♪ ain't nothin to me ♪ ain't nothin to me [ crowd murmurs ] hey! ♪ [ howls ] ♪ >> chris: and we're back now with senator john mccain. senator, welcome. >> thank you, chris. >> chris: you just heard nancy pelosi tal
as well as our foes he doesn't have broad support in the u.s. congress which limits his ability to carry out his job. >> chris: and finally, senator coburn, a bipartisan group of senators is reportedly close to a deal, to greatly expand background checks of almost all gun sales and the hold-up is whether or not the government should keep records of those sales. question: you are a member of this group, how close are you to a deal and what is the problem with keeping records? >> well, i don't think we are that goes to a deal and there will not be recordkeeping on legitimate, law abiding gun owners in this country and if they want to eliminate the benefits of actually trying to prevent the sale to people who are mentally ill and to criminals, all they have to do is create a recordkeeping and that will kill this bill. if you really want to improve it you have to eliminate the recordkeeping and give people the right and the responsibility to do the right thing and, that is check on the next list to make sure you are in the selling a gun to somebody who is in one of those two categories. >> c
drop off free boxes. i wear a lot of hats. well, technically i wear one. the u.s. postal service®, no business too small. well, technically i wear one. thyou eat less...ing weiyou lose weight.et. it's a great plan... until you get hungry. that's the time to take slimful. one tasty 90-calorie slimful and a glass of water satisfies hunger for hours making it easier to eat smaller meals, and resist snacking. your friends might think you found the secret to losing weight. but it's no secret... it's slimful. eating less is a beautiful thing. >> chris: we are back with senator john mccain. senator, welcome. >> thank you, chris. >> chris: you just heard nancy pelosi talk about the automatic spending cuts that kick in on march 1. she wants a mix of cuts and, yes, more taxes, which i know you don't like. on the other hand, if you go to the automatic cuts, sequestration you get a 13% cut over the rest of this year in the pentagon which i know you also don't like. if it comes down to that, higher taxes or sequestration, the pentagon cuts, where do you you go? where do you come down? >> obv
Search Results 0 to 8 of about 9 (some duplicates have been removed)